Found out that this was posted on a separate blog! Well here it is on the right one now. These are the video reviews that were done awhile back.
“Color and B/W”
Watching this video was like watching a love story with the
two lovers hating each other. The video
has a simple feel to it, which makes it vague, and in decisive toward the way
they feel. I found that the black and
white switch was more of a distraction than it was affective. Thought that the video should come with a
warning to people having seizures. The
use of the ocean was interesting and the sound track was ok, but the problem
was it was all white noise to me. It
seemed to me that the sound track was a good cover to the white noise of the
ocean. Particularly, I wouldn’t watch a
video like this and think that it was worth while in explaining who they are,
only that they have to put more time into a concept and create something that
has depth to it, like the ocean, and not shallow, like a puddle.
Looking as the black and white, over contrasted, and
inverted images, you can’t tell what you are supposed to look at. I felt like I was view a tribal ritual gone
wrong. Was it suppose to rain or were
suppose to be a god or goddess coming from the ocean to take it’s wrath for
putting it in a underwater dungeon for thousands of years? Either way, I felt this wasn’t a very
affective video and had no outstand value to it what so ever. Most of the time I would be kinder, but it
was just that bad, in my own opinion.
“Type Overkill”
For this video, where should I begin? The music started off good, though I felt the
first 10 seconds was a waste of time, so I think he didn’t have enough footage
or layout for a four-minute video. To
add to that thought at the one-minute mark, if you watch closely, he repeats
his actions two or three times with him walking. It wouldn’t be noticeable, but the same pull
movies across the video and the exact same place for it. It make it look like
the video is glitching, which if he is talking about everything being “broken”
might work cause I feel the video does a good job of acting that way. Repetitive
use of phrases and mirroring them to images of what looks like rocks on a beach
seems to be a bit of bummer. His idea
seems to be that there is nothing there, but there is stuff there. His message is lost to me. Was this an
abstract piece of work? I think so. I
honestly have gotten bored of the video after only two-minutes in. The music is slow and his shots are quick.
The type flashes too quickly for the screen for people to be able to read
it. I’m still now sure why he is
choosing to use blurry shots entirely. Watching this video was like watching
paint dry. I could have hoped to be
interested in it, but honestly find no point to it worth taking from it. By the end of the video the only thing I
wanted to do was call the suicide hotline to see if they can track this kid
down and help them out. Mean? Maybe, but that’s the gods honest truth.
“Weird and Awesome Self Portrait”
How can I put this? This was abstract and I loved it. I don’t know if it was the Steven Hawking’s
voice going on in the background or the actual shot choice. The person has an impeccable eye for making
sound cuts, which hold depth to them. I love how he uses everyday objects, which
people never would think of using through the video. The constant changing of subject matter and
the repetitive reoccurrence of main subjects makes me sit through this video
and enjoy it. The close shots with high depth-of-field on ever day objects make
great for showing the things in his life.
By focusing on one object he is blurring out everything else around him
and focusing on that one thing. Between
these shots, he places b-roll of random segments of filmstrips and noise,
helping to separate the difference in each of his person subjects. I was entranced by the voice, though it seems
the words didn’t entirely seem cohesive (though I feel they still have a good
meaning to the video). If I had to pick
my favorite video then this one will have been it.
Here I am, watching this video, and all I can think is that
he make society seem to be an empty circle of robots. He makes everything in life seem like a set routine
that people follow, because that is what is necessary for them to survive. He shows how he is caught in the rut and how
he fits in with the crowd because of it. The was a well organized piece of work
and I found it to be absolutely well done.
Matts analysis of the videos where so opinionated, it was a disappointment that the links weren’t merged in the post. From his used tough criticism from reviewing the first video “B/W,” the reader really understands that he doesn’t approve of the video. It’s beneficial to the reader that Matt describe the details of the video that he didn’t like, since the actual film isn’t available. Matt was sure to do this for each movie critique, giving examples of the features he didn’t like throughout the video. The second movie evaluation focused on the scene shots. I like how matt gave a sequenced study of the film, giving examples of what worked and what didn’t. The feelings towards these two videos were very strong. I think in some cases to not offend readers of different likings, a writer should be delicate in stating opinions. The last of the video critique, Matt seemed to enjoy the most. Matt showed his appreciation by expressing his views that were similar to the theme of the movie. I think this made his critique seem more sincere. Had Matt supported his earlier critiques with more suggestions of improvements, the post would have been more courteous.
ReplyDeleteFor this particular post in discussing 3 different videos, I was confused. It would have made more sense if there were:
ReplyDelete1. An opening paragraph detailing what you’re talking about, what a self-portrait video is, etc.
2. You should have provided either a link or a visual of the actual video you were discussing. I wasn’t sure which videos you were critiquing and I wasn’t going to go back to the original blog post with all of the videos to find it.
3. Proofread. I noticed a lot of typos and sentence fragments.
4. Since you didn’t provide a link to the video, it would have helped to describe your opinions in more detail. Instead, I felt like I was reading off a list of your dislikes/likes, without any detail or explanation.
5. Instead of ending your post with the last critique, a few sentences at the end summarizing your post would have been good.
Besides that, you seem to have strong opinions on each video, with necessary points to make. Instead of listing the likes/dislikes, you could have listed what the person could have done better or different to make their video stronger.